Beacon's stated capabilities include:
The Key Differences Between beacon.li and Certinia
Managing the business vs. executing the work
Planning work vs. performing work
Optimizing capacity vs. expanding capacity
Start with the bottleneck, not the category. If the goal is to improve implementation efficiency, beacon.li can address both the work being managed and the work being performed.
If your primary problem is...
Look at...
Repetitive configuration work
Manual data migration
Manual testing or UAT
Slow time-to-go-live
Too much consultant effort per implementation
Limited implementation capacity
Scaling delivery without proportional hiring
Improving resource utilization through automation
Manual requirements analysis
Resource allocation and capacity planning

and
Project financials and services forecasting

and
Portfolio visibility and implementation execution

and
Improving resource utilization through automation

and
Yes. The two platforms can operate at different layers of the same delivery process:
What Changes When You Choose beacon.li
Go-lives happen faster because more of the implementation work gets executed by AI. You can take on more customers without scaling delivery headcount at the same rate. You spend fewer consultant hours on repetitive requirements, configuration, migration, and testing. Implementation becomes more consistent from project to project. And your consultants get more time for the decisions, exceptions, and customer conversations that actually need their expertise.
Do You Have to Give Up Certinia?

How to Get Started 🚀
Start with a conversation about your current implementation process. Then run beacon.li against a real implementation in a demo or test environment through a 7-day POC. Review the results across implementation speed, manual effort, consistency, and capacity. If beacon.li proves it can take meaningful execution work off your team's plate, add it to the delivery process alongside the systems you already use.
Frequentlt asked question
Is beacon.li really a replacement for Certinia?
Not as a like-for-like PSA. beacon.li is built for a different layer of the operation: automating implementation execution. If your goal is to reduce the manual work consuming implementation capacity, beacon.li addresses the execution gap directly.
Do I need integrations to use beacon.li?
What can it actually do?
Who is this for?













