7 Best Certinia Alternatives for 2027: PSA Platforms, Veda AI, and Implementation Automation

Certinia is a well-established Professional Services Automation (PSA) platform for businesses that need to manage projects, resources, time, expenses, billing, and financial performance. Built on Salesforce, it connects the professional services lifecycle, from sales and estimation to project delivery and financial management.

Its AI capabilities have also evolved significantly. Through Veda, Certinia has expanded beyond traditional PSA automation into AI agents, intelligent actions, and agentic workflows that support sales, planning, resourcing, project delivery, and customer success.

So why would a business look for a Certinia alternative in 2027?

Because not every organization is trying to solve the same problem.

Some businesses want a different PSA platform with stronger resource planning, more accessible financial workflows, or a better fit for their existing technology stack. Others want to improve customer onboarding and implementation delivery. And some are looking beyond project management altogether: they want AI to perform more of the actual work involved in implementing enterprise software.

That last requirement is where Beacon takes a different approach.

Rather than positioning itself as a replacement for Certinia's complete PSA capabilities, Beacon focuses on understanding the enterprise product being implemented. It learns the product through its user interface, builds context around its configuration structures, workflows, and dependencies, and uses that understanding to execute implementation activities such as configuration, data setup, migration validation, contextual UAT, cutover, and hypercare.

This is an important distinction when comparing Beacon with Certinia and its Veda AI capabilities. Veda brings AI to the professional services business, while Beacon focuses on product-aware execution inside the enterprise software being implemented.

Not every platform in this list replaces Certinia in the same way. Some are direct PSA alternatives, while others focus on implementation delivery or automating specific parts of the services lifecycle. We've included both because businesses evaluating Certinia alternatives may be looking to replace their PSA, improve implementation delivery, or reduce the manual work involved in enterprise software implementation.

Quick comparison: 7 Certinia alternatives for 2027

This is a category-based shortlist, not a claim that every platform is a like-for-like replacement for Certinia. Beacon and Rocketlane, in particular, address implementation execution rather than the full scope of traditional PSA functionality.

1. Beacon

Best for: Automating enterprise software implementation and reducing the manual effort involved in delivery.

Beacon approaches enterprise software implementation from a different starting point than traditional PSA platforms.

In many implementation projects, the biggest bottleneck isn't planning the work. It's actually doing it.

Implementation teams spend significant time navigating complex software interfaces, configuring customer environments, managing dependencies, preparing and migrating data, validating workflows, creating UAT scenarios, and supporting customers after go-live.

Much of this work depends on people who understand the product being implemented. As a result, implementation capacity is often constrained by the availability of experienced consultants and specialists.

Beacon is designed to address this problem by learning the enterprise product directly through its user interface.

It understands the product's screens, configuration structures, workflows, dependencies, and interaction paths. It uses that product context to execute supported implementation activities.

The important distinction is that Beacon isn't primarily asking customers to build agents and teach AI how their enterprise software works. It focuses on learning the product itself and using that understanding to do the implementation heavy lifting.

Certinia + Veda vs Beacon: Capability comparison

Beacon vs Certinia Veda: What is the actual difference?

It would be inaccurate to describe Certinia Veda as just a chatbot or a tool that only creates project plans.

Veda is a substantial agentic offering. Its capabilities include agents for estimation, RFP responses, SOW creation, solution architecture, implementation planning, resourcing, project management, project quality, customer success, and more.

In September 2026, Certinia announced 14 additional Veda agents and expanded its Veda Intelligent Actions library from 64 to 135. It also introduced deployment options across Certinia, Salesforce Agentforce, and external tools through MCP. Certinia's Veda expansion announcement.

Veda can also execute actions within its permission, approval, and audit controls. Its Implementation Plan Agent creates structured plans, its Solution Architect Agent translates customer requirements into solution designs, and its Project Manager Agent supports delivery workflows. Certinia Veda capabilities.

So the distinction isn't that Veda can plan while Beacon can execute. Veda has agentic execution capabilities too.

The difference is the context each platform is designed to understand.

Certinia Veda understands the services business. It uses connected information about customers, projects, resources, financials, sales activity, and organizational expertise to help services teams make decisions and execute workflows.

Beacon understands the enterprise product being implemented. It learns how the target application works through its UI, including configuration structures, workflows, dependencies, and interaction paths.

That product understanding is then applied to the implementation itself.

What Beacon does across the implementation lifecycle

• Requirements and configuration: Beacon interprets customer requirements and statements of work, then uses product context to configure supported environments, workflows, permissions, and settings.

• Data setup and migration: It supports migration sequences, data validation, and identification of mismatches.

• Contextual UAT: It generates test cases from actual customer configurations, using real workflows, fields, IDs, and values.

• Cutover readiness: It performs pre-cutover checks and helps identify configuration and data alignment issues.

• Hypercare: It answers product-specific setup questions, provides contextual guidance, and routes complex issues to specialists.

Beacon's published product approach emphasizes learning through the UI without requiring integrations, APIs, or custom builds for product learning. It also connects requirements, configuration, testing, data, and hypercare into a repeatable implementation flow. Beacon.

Where Beacon may be a better fit than Certinia

Consider a professional services company that implements enterprise HCM, CRM, ERP, or financial software for its customers.

Certinia can help that company manage the services business: estimates, staffing, projects, utilization, billing, and profitability. Veda can automate many of the associated planning and delivery workflows.

But the implementation team still has to perform work inside the target enterprise application.

That is the problem Beacon is designed to address.

For a company whose biggest bottleneck is manual configuration, migration, testing, and post-go-live support, Beacon may address a problem that its existing PSA platform does not fully solve.

What to check before choosing Beacon

• Does Beacon support the enterprise product you implement?

• Which configuration and migration workflows can it execute?

• How does it handle exceptions and unusual customer environments?

• Which actions require human approval?

• Can it produce reliable, repeatable UAT results?

• How are changes and execution outcomes audited?

Our take: Beacon is the strongest option on this list for organizations whose biggest bottleneck is the manual execution of enterprise software implementations. It is not a like-for-like replacement for Certinia's complete PSA capabilities, but it addresses a different and important part of the services lifecycle.

2. Rocketlane

Best for: Customer onboarding, implementation project delivery, and AI-powered execution.

Rocketlane combines customer onboarding, implementation project management, customer collaboration, resource management, and AI-powered execution.

Its Nitro platform is particularly relevant for organizations that want to automate repetitive implementation work.

Nitro includes purpose-built agents for configuration, migration, documentation, and workforce-related tasks. Its Configuration Agent supports customer environment setup, including fields, roles, permissions, and broader instance configuration. Its Migration Agent helps map, transform, and validate data. Rocketlane Nitro.

This makes Rocketlane one of the most relevant platforms to compare with Beacon when implementation execution is the primary requirement.

Certinia + Veda vs Rocketlane: Capability comparison

What makes Rocketlane different?

Rocketlane combines implementation project management with AI agents that perform execution tasks.

That matters because implementation teams often spend considerable time on repetitive work that doesn't require the full attention of experienced consultants.

Nitro is designed to take on some of that work, including configuration, migration, and documentation. Its agents are intended to handle tasks that would otherwise require repeated manual work from delivery teams.

Certinia, meanwhile, is broader in its focus on professional services operations. Veda supports estimation, solution design, implementation planning, resourcing, project delivery, and other services workflows.

The difference is the emphasis: Rocketlane focuses on customer implementation delivery, while Certinia connects implementation projects to a broader PSA and financial management environment.

Where Rocketlane may be a better fit than Certinia

Rocketlane is worth considering when customer onboarding and implementation delivery are the main priorities, particularly when teams want project collaboration and execution agents in the same environment.

What to check before switching

• Does Nitro support the target products and implementation workflows you need?

• How does it handle configuration exceptions and customer-specific requirements?

• Does its project and resource management cover your PSA needs?

• How does its execution model compare with Veda and other tools you already use?

• What human review is required before changes reach production?

Our take: Rocketlane is a strong option for teams that want implementation project management and execution agents in one environment. It should be shortlisted alongside Beacon when reducing implementation effort is the priority.

3. Kantata

Best for: Enterprise professional services management, resource planning, and delivery intelligence.

Kantata is a professional services automation platform built to help organizations manage projects, resources, financial performance, and delivery operations.

Its focus is on connecting the different parts of a professional services business so organizations can make better decisions about staffing, project performance, and profitability.

Kantata has also made significant investments in AI through its Expertise Engine. Its capabilities include the Expertise Agent, agentic business intelligence, and workflows that use a firm's accumulated delivery knowledge to support decisions and actions. Kantata Expertise Engine.

Certinia + Veda vs Kantata: Capability comparison

What makes Kantata different?

Kantata's strongest differentiator is its focus on institutional knowledge.

Its Expertise Engine is designed to capture how a professional services firm operates and make that expertise reusable across projects. The Expertise Agent can use information about projects, people, documents, and delivery patterns to support decisions and execute workflows.

Certinia's Veda takes a similarly serious approach to agentic services automation. It draws on a unified data foundation and more than 17 years of professional services domain expertise.

So the comparison isn't about which platform has AI. Both do.

The more useful questions are how each platform models services knowledge, how it supports resource and project decisions, and how well its workflows fit the organization's existing processes.

Where Kantata may be a better fit than Certinia

Kantata deserves consideration when resource management, delivery predictability, and institutional knowledge are central to the organization's operating model.

Its AI-driven PSA approach is designed to learn from a firm's own delivery history and apply that expertise across forecasting, resourcing, and financial management.

What to check before switching

• Resource planning and forecasting accuracy.

• Depth of project financial management.

• How the Expertise Engine uses your firm's historical information.

• How agentic actions are governed.

• Integration requirements with CRM and ERP systems.

• The fit with your existing Salesforce environment and operating processes.

Our take: Kantata is one of the strongest alternatives for organizations looking for a broad PSA platform with substantial professional services intelligence. It is particularly relevant when resource management and delivery predictability are major priorities.

4. BigTime

Best for: Time, expense, billing, resource management, and project financial operations.

BigTime is a professional services platform with a strong focus on time and expense management, project financials, billing, resource management, and profitability.

It is particularly relevant for consulting firms and other services businesses that want better control over billable hours, project budgets, invoicing, and financial performance.

BigTime's AI capabilities include AVA, its AI assistant, an Expense Agent, and a Resourcing Agent. Its current product information describes the Expense Agent as available and the Resourcing Agent as supporting AI-assisted staff-to-project matching. Buyers should confirm the precise functionality available in their chosen subscription and rollout. BigTime.

Certinia + Veda vs BigTime: Capability comparison

What makes BigTime different?

BigTime is particularly attractive to firms that want to improve the operational processes surrounding billable work and financial administration.

Its financial-first approach connects quoting, staffing, time, expenses, billing, and cash flow. AVA provides an AI assistant, while its specialized agents address expense and resource workflows.

Certinia offers a broader enterprise PSA environment, with a strong emphasis on connecting sales, resource management, delivery, and financial operations through Salesforce.

BigTime can be a more focused option for businesses whose immediate priorities are time capture, expenses, invoicing, and project financial visibility.

Where BigTime may be a better fit than Certinia

BigTime is worth considering when a firm wants to improve financial control and reduce administrative friction around time, expenses, billing, and project profitability without necessarily needing the full scope of a larger enterprise PSA environment.

What to check before switching

• Time and expense workflows.

• Billing and invoicing requirements.

• Resource planning depth.

• Financial reporting and accounting integrations.

• AI functionality available in the edition you intend to purchase.

• How the platform handles complex multi-entity or global services operations.

Our take: BigTime is worth considering for professional services businesses that want a focused platform for time, expenses, billing, and financial operations rather than the full scope of an enterprise PSA environment.

5. Accelo

Best for: Connected client management, project delivery, resource planning, and financial operations.

Accelo is a service operations platform that helps businesses manage client relationships, sales, projects, service delivery, and financial workflows.

Its value comes from connecting operational processes rather than treating project management as an isolated activity.

Accelo has developed a broad AI offering that includes native AI, MCP connections with external AI tools, and agentic assistants. Its capabilities include AI-assisted resourcing, project insights, predictive risk identification, profitability forecasting, and automated replanning scenarios. Accelo AI.

Certinia + Veda vs Accelo: Capability comparison

What makes Accelo different?

Accelo brings client management, service delivery, project operations, and financial workflows together in one platform.

Its AI capabilities help teams use operational data to improve planning accuracy, resource decisions, and profitability. It can also connect with external AI tools through MCP.

Certinia is generally more suited to organizations looking for a Salesforce-native enterprise PSA and deeper services financial management. Accelo may be attractive to service businesses that want connected client and project operations.

Where Accelo may be a better fit than Certinia

Accelo is worth considering when the organization wants to connect client work, project delivery, resource planning, and financial operations in a service-focused environment.

What to check before switching

• Complexity of project accounting and billing.

• Resource planning and forecasting requirements.

• CRM and client management requirements.

• Financial reporting depth.

• Integration needs with existing business applications.

• Which AI capabilities are available and how they are governed.

Our take: Accelo is a practical alternative for service businesses that want connected operations and AI-assisted decision-making without necessarily needing the full enterprise PSA structure of Certinia.

6. Scoro

Best for: Consulting, creative, and professional services firms that want to manage work and business performance in one platform.

Scoro combines project management, resource planning, quoting, time tracking, billing, and financial reporting.

Its platform gives services businesses a connected view of work, from the initial opportunity through project delivery and financial performance.

Scoro's AI assistant, ELI, is embedded directly into the platform. It can understand operational data, surface insights, and take actions such as creating tasks, scheduling meetings, logging time, managing time off, and handling resource bookings.

ELI operates within user permissions and asks for confirmation before taking actions. It also uses a credit-based model, so buyers should evaluate usage allowances and costs. Scoro ELI documentation.

Certinia + Veda vs Scoro: Capability comparison

What makes Scoro different?

Scoro's strength is the combination of business management and project operations.

ELI makes it easier for users to retrieve information and perform everyday tasks through natural-language instructions. It can help with resource bookings, project diagnostics, quotes, calendar management, and other operational tasks.

Certinia is more focused on enterprise professional services operations, with a strong emphasis on its Salesforce ecosystem and services financial management.

Scoro may be a better fit for firms looking for a unified platform to manage their work, teams, and profitability without needing the same enterprise PSA architecture.

Where Scoro may be a better fit than Certinia

Scoro is worth considering for consulting and creative firms that want project operations, quoting, resource planning, and financial visibility in one environment.

What to check before switching

• Financial reporting and project accounting depth.

• Resource forecasting and scheduling.

• ELI action permissions and confirmation requirements.

• AI credit allowances and usage costs.

• Integration and reporting requirements.

• Suitability for complex enterprise services operations.

Our take: Scoro is worth evaluating for consulting and creative firms that want project management and business operations in one platform, with an AI assistant that can perform everyday actions.

7. NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro

Best for: Businesses already using NetSuite that want project operations connected to their ERP and financial environment.

NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro, formerly known as OpenAir, is a professional services automation solution that supports project management, resource management, time and expense tracking, project accounting, and advanced billing.

Its biggest advantage is its relationship with the broader NetSuite ecosystem.

Businesses already using NetSuite for ERP and financial management may find it useful to connect project delivery and services operations to their existing business systems. Oracle SuiteProjects Pro overview.

SuiteProjects Pro also has specific AI capabilities, including NetSuite Expert in SuiteAnswers and Project Summary. These should be distinguished from the broader AI capabilities available across the NetSuite platform. Oracle AI documentation.

Certinia + Veda vs NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro: Capability comparison

What makes NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro different?

NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro is a logical option for businesses already invested in the NetSuite ecosystem.

Its appeal is the ability to connect project operations with a broader ERP and financial environment.

Certinia offers a similar ecosystem advantage for organizations standardized on Salesforce. Veda adds agentic services workflows on top of Certinia's data foundation.

The decision often comes down to which platform better fits the existing technology stack, financial processes, reporting requirements, and services operating model.

Where NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro may be a better fit than Certinia

It is worth considering when the business already uses NetSuite and wants project operations, resource management, time and expense tracking, and project accounting within that ecosystem.

What to check before switching

• NetSuite ERP integration requirements.

• Project financial management depth.

• Resource management and forecasting.

• Reporting and business intelligence.

• The specific AI features available in SuiteProjects Pro.

• Whether the AI functionality meets your needs beyond knowledge search and project summaries.

Our take: NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro is a natural alternative for businesses already operating in the NetSuite ecosystem. Its specific AI features are more focused than the broader Veda agentic offering, so compare the exact workflows you need rather than the overall AI capabilities of each vendor.

Direct PSA replacement or implementation automation: Which do you actually need?

This is one of the most important questions to answer before choosing a Certinia alternative.

A business may think it needs a new PSA platform when its real problem is something different.

For example, a professional services organization might be struggling with low resource utilization, poor project profitability, or complicated billing processes. Those are PSA problems.

Another organization might have a strong PSA platform but still spend weeks configuring customer environments, preparing migration data, validating workflows, and supporting customers after go-live. Those are implementation execution problems.

The two should not be confused.

Which category fits your requirement?

Can Beacon and Certinia work together?

Yes. For some professional services organizations, that may be a more useful approach than replacing one with the other.

Certinia can continue to manage the services business: project financials, resources, time, billing, forecasting, and operational reporting.

Veda can automate services workflows using the connected context available in Certinia.

Beacon can focus on the work happening inside the enterprise product being implemented: configuration, migration, validation, testing, cutover, and hypercare.

This gives each platform a distinct role.

The objective is not to force one platform to replace everything. It is to reduce the manual work across the entire services lifecycle.

How to choose the right Certinia alternative

Choosing a Certinia alternative requires more than comparing feature lists. The platforms above solve different problems, and the best choice depends on what your organization needs to improve.

Here are five areas to consider.

1. Identify the actual business problem

Start by identifying what isn't working today.

• If you need end-to-end professional services automation, compare Certinia with Kantata, NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro, Accelo, and Scoro.

• If implementation delivery and customer onboarding are your main challenges, evaluate Rocketlane.

• If time tracking, expenses, and invoicing are your biggest priorities, look closely at BigTime.

• If the bottleneck is the manual work involved in configuring, migrating, testing, and supporting enterprise software, consider Beacon.

2. Evaluate what the AI actually understands

AI features can look similar in a product comparison but operate on very different information.

Certinia Veda understands the services organization through its connected business data and domain expertise.

Kantata's Expertise Engine focuses on institutional knowledge and services delivery patterns.

Accelo uses operational data to support project, resource, and financial decisions.

Rocketlane's Nitro agents work with implementation project context and their configured knowledge sources.

Beacon learns the target enterprise product itself through its UI, building context around its configuration structures, workflows, and dependencies.

Ask every vendor:

• What data and context does the AI use?

• Does it understand business processes, the target application, or both?

• Can it execute actions or only recommend them?

• What human approvals are required?

• How are errors, exceptions, and audit trails handled?

3. Evaluate the difference between planning and execution

An AI system that generates an implementation plan is useful. But it is different from a system that can perform the work described in the plan.

For example:

• Can it create a solution design?

• Can it configure a real customer environment?

• Can it map and validate migration data?

• Can it generate tests based on the actual configuration?

• Can it identify blockers before cutover?

• Can it support customers after go-live?

For implementation-focused platforms, request a demonstration of real execution rather than a presentation of dashboards or AI-generated recommendations.

4. Consider your existing technology ecosystem

Certinia is built on Salesforce, while NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro is naturally relevant to organizations using NetSuite.

Other platforms have their own integration and ecosystem considerations.

Before choosing, assess:

• Existing CRM and ERP systems.

• Financial and accounting integrations.

• Data migration requirements.

• Security and access controls.

• Reporting and business intelligence.

• Integration maintenance and long-term ownership.

5. Compare implementation effort and total cost

The total cost of a platform includes more than its subscription price.

Consider configuration, integrations, data migration, training, maintenance, AI licensing, consumption costs, and the amount of manual work that remains after deployment.

For Certinia, specifically, ask which Veda features are included in your commercial package and which require additional licensing or consumption.

For other platforms, verify the availability of AI agents, plan restrictions, usage limits, and implementation costs.

Finally, run a proof of concept against a representative workflow and measure time saved, accuracy, exception handling, and the amount of human intervention required.

Frequently asked questions

1. What is the best alternative to Certinia in 2027?

The best alternative depends on the problem you're trying to solve.

Kantata is worth evaluating for professional services automation and resource management. NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro is relevant for businesses already using NetSuite. Rocketlane is a strong option for implementation delivery. BigTime is worth considering for time and financial operations.

Beacon is particularly relevant when the objective is to automate enterprise software implementation itself, including configuration, migration, testing, and post-go-live support.

2. Is Beacon a direct replacement for Certinia?

No. Beacon and Certinia have different primary purposes.

Certinia is a PSA platform that supports services operations, project management, resource management, and financial workflows.

Beacon focuses on automating enterprise software implementation by learning the target product through its UI and using that understanding to perform supported implementation activities.

They may be complementary rather than mutually exclusive.

3. How does Beacon compare with Certinia Veda?

Certinia Veda uses connected services data and professional services domain expertise to support sales, estimation, solution design, resourcing, project delivery, financial operations, and customer success.

Beacon focuses on understanding the enterprise product being implemented. It learns through the UI and uses that context to support configuration, data setup, migration validation, contextual UAT, cutover, and hypercare.

The main difference is the context each platform is designed to understand: Veda focuses on the services business, while Beacon focuses on the target enterprise product.

4. Can Certinia Veda execute implementation work?

Yes. Veda includes agentic capabilities, not just information retrieval and reporting.

Its Solution Architect Agent translates customer needs into solution designs, its Implementation Plan Agent builds structured execution plans, and its Project Manager Agent supports delivery workflows. Other agents support SOW creation, project quality, resourcing, and customer success.

When comparing Veda with Beacon, buyers should evaluate the specific target application, actions, and workflows involved. In particular, distinguish services workflow execution from configuration and validation inside a separate enterprise application.

5. Which Certinia alternative is best for implementation automation?

Rocketlane and Beacon are particularly relevant.

Rocketlane's Nitro platform provides purpose-built agents for implementation configuration, migration, documentation, and workforce tasks.

Beacon focuses on learning the target product through its UI and using that understanding to carry out supported configuration, migration, testing, and support activities.

The right choice depends on the implementation workflows, target products, and execution requirements involved.

6. Which Certinia alternatives offer AI agents?

Several platforms now offer AI agents or agentic capabilities.

• Certinia: Veda agents and intelligent actions across the services lifecycle.

• Rocketlane: Nitro implementation agents.

• Kantata: Expertise Agent and agentic business intelligence.

• BigTime: AVA assistant, Expense Agent, and Resourcing Agent.

• Accelo: AI-assisted operations and agentic assistants.

• Scoro: ELI, which can perform permitted operational actions.

• NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro: NetSuite Expert and AI-powered Project Summary.

The availability and scope of these features vary. Buyers should confirm the current product edition, licensing, and release status.

7. Should a company replace its PSA platform to automate implementation?

Not necessarily.

A PSA platform manages the business of delivering services: projects, people, time, expenses, billing, and financial performance.

Implementation automation addresses the work required to configure and deploy the software itself.

A business may benefit more from keeping its existing PSA platform while adding a solution that automates implementation execution.

8. What should I compare when evaluating Certinia alternatives?

Start with the core requirements:

• Project and portfolio management.

• Resource planning and utilization.

• Time and expense tracking.

• Project accounting, billing, and profitability.

• AI capabilities and agentic execution.

• Integration and ecosystem requirements.

• Implementation effort and total cost.

If implementation execution is important, also compare product understanding, configuration automation, data migration, contextual UAT, cutover readiness, and hypercare.

Final verdict: Which Certinia alternative should you choose?

If your goal is to reduce the time, effort, and complexity involved in enterprise software implementation, Beacon is the platform we recommend.

While platforms like Kantata, BigTime, Accelo, Scoro, and NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro focus primarily on professional services management, Beacon addresses a different and increasingly important challenge: automating the actual work involved in implementing enterprise software.

Beacon learns the target enterprise product through its user interface and uses that understanding to support configuration, data migration, validation, contextual UAT, cutover, and hypercare.

Rocketlane is another strong option for implementation delivery, particularly with its Nitro AI agents. However, Beacon's product-aware approach makes it particularly compelling for organizations looking to automate implementation activities inside the enterprise applications they deploy.

For businesses evaluating Certinia alternatives, our recommendation is clear:

Choose Beacon if your priority is automating enterprise software implementation and reducing dependence on manual consulting effort.

If you still need traditional PSA capabilities such as resource management, project financials, time tracking, and billing, retain or evaluate a dedicated PSA platform alongside Beacon.

Ultimately, the future of enterprise implementation isn't just about managing projects more efficiently. It's about using AI to do the implementation work itself. That's where Beacon stands out.